This section will be updated regularly with more Decisions.

Back to Decisions Main Page

Regional Decisions

F01N-4F-C-06215863 Chino CA (WOO)

C27149

C27211

C27216

C27224

C28011

C28016

This is an Article 19 appeal filed by the NALC protesting proposed changes to Section 546 of the Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM) -(Q01N-4Q-C 07229522 ELM 546 Revision)

Did the Employer violate Article 41 of the National Agreement when it refused to honor the OPT of Emma Hudson on Route 211 at the Long Beach Downtown Station on or about 1/19/99? If so, what is the appropriate remedy?

Did management violate Articles 3, 5, 8.5 and 10 of the National Agreement, the Letter Carrier Paragraph, and Pacific Area MOU on Daily Overtime Violations (04/14/2003) when they unilaterally changed practices and established a policy that required non-ODL regulars to continually and repeatedly work mandatory overtime when assistance was otherwise available, and if so, what is the appropriate remedy?

National Decisions

Did the Employer violate the parties' agreement when transitional employes in the NALC bargaining unit worked more than 12 hours? If so, what is the appropriate remedy?

Did the Employer violate the parties' National Agreement by failing to use NALC Transitional Employees for auxiliary assistance? If so, what is an appropriate remedy?

Does the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace constitute an enforceable agreement between the parties so that the Union may use the negotiated grievance procedure to resolve disputes rising under the Joint Statement? If so, what is an appropriate remedy?

Did the Employer violate the parties' agreement by assigning the grievant to the Clerk Craft as a part-time flexible employee rather than as a full-time regular employee? If so, what is an appropriate remedy?

Did the Employer violate the parties' National Agreement , specifically Article 41 , Section 3, Paragraph 0, when full -time duty assignments were abolished due to route adjustments and subsequent bidding was restricted to individual stations / branches , as opposed to being done on an installation - wide basis? If so, what is an appropriate remedy?

Does the reinstatement of an employee pursuant to a Dispute Resolution Team decision resolving a grievance over that employee's removal under Article 16, Section 5 automatically entitle that employee to back pay under Article 16, Section 6, Paragraph C?

Whether management has the right to inspect city delivery routes on all six (6) days and, if so, does management have the right to count the mail and make all applicable entries on PS Form 1838C each day of the inspection?

Did the employer violate the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace through the behavior of Postal Inspector Bidwell on November 3, 1994 , when he confronted carrier Mary Sudac and 1 ) repeatedly and angrily pointed his finger in her face and 2) repeatedly yelled at her? If so, what is the appropriate remedy?

Back to Decisions Main Page